
if i have ever seen enough of this, I am probably dead


if i have ever seen enough of this, I am probably dead

or: how I stopped fearing AI
finding a new home is hard.. not only do searching WHERE you want to live.. and IF you can find work there.. but also
it started as an idea.. what if AI could understand what I want and help me create a shortlist of objects, that I want to investigate.
the basis is an email search agent from the mortgage agency / broker. it is then enriched by geodata, water, neighbourhood, water, noise, etc.. data that I can publicly find. furthermore a browser plugin pulls data from the expose, like price, condition, energy label, etc.
this is not AI doing my job, this is interaction between GPT and a human, massively improving my capabilities, saving me a lot of time and.. honestly.. I haven’t had so much fun with a self-hosted project in years. oh yea.. it is self-hosted, I don’t think anyone would like to do this and not make money with it. I don’t care. download the code.. adjust the scoring algorithm for your personal situation, find the house of your dreams.
I was afraid if AI. Now, I am still (or even more) afraid.. but I have seen what a powerful engineering tool it can be.
Not by asking ChatGPT “build me an app” once (I admit, thats how it started) but through hundreds of iterations: requirements, implementation, production tests, failures, debugging and architectural changes we have now arrived here:
AI did not remove the engineering work. It dramatically increased what one person could build.









in the end I can create a top-3 list that I can investigate deeper.. ask for the exact address, rescore land, water and noise levels.. contact the broker and plan a visit.
the “workflow” is like this:
Property alerts
|
Email parser
|
SQLite -- Geo / Water / Noise
|
Telegram
|
Human + Browser + Tampermonkey
|
Browser enrichment
|
Explainable scoring
For example, a good house might score like this:
Price + condition 19 / 25
Plot 16 / 20
Neighbours 17 / 25
Quiet 15 / 15
Water 8 / 10
Living area 4 / 5
Energy label "A" +2 <- bonus
--------------------------------
Total 81 / 100 -> very interesting
Energy is deliberately shown as an adjustment rather than as a fixed category worth a certain number of points. A good label can add points; a poor label can subtract them.
A different house can look cheap at first but still rank much lower once condition and energy are taken into account:
Purchase price 130,000 EUR
Condition surcharge +140,000 EUR (major renovation)
Effective price 270,000 EUR
Price + condition 9 / 25
Plot 11 / 20
Neighbours 6 / 25
Quiet 12 / 15
Water 7 / 10
Living area 3 / 5
Energy label "H" -8 <- penalty
--------------------------------
Total 40 / 100 -> archive
In the current model, for example, energy label A gives +2 points, while label H deducts 8 points. The detailed energy adjustments are configurable and documented with the rest of the scoring model.
I don’t like proprietary stuff.. also I thing GPT and immowelt/immobilienscout earn enough. this is just me using what is out there so.. use it. find your dream.




Source: @rdkieran

you are not dealing with a human.

I don’t have instagram – source is https://www.instagram.com/p/DZL8TJeGRYP/

seriously.. why is it so hard???
the temperatures are rising above 35° here and the people gave me a straw hat because apparently it’s dangerous to walk in the sun without hair.
Anna told me I look like a character from a Van Gogh painting so I guess I’m going to roll with it. (Did I mention that I hate hats?)




even a guardian needs rest. But I’ve never encountered a dog that sleeps like this everyday ?